The reaction of US policy-makers to the killing of Osama bin Laden in a compound not too far from
the Pakistani capital and within a stone throw from Pakistan’s military academy
has pushed US-Pakistani relations to their lowest point in years. Over the last
few weeks policy-makers in Washington have sought to out-do one another in their
demand for blood over what they see the Pakistani military as being inept or complicity
in bin Laden’s ability to hide in Abbottabad. With the dust settling, US defence officials (Secretary Gates and Chairman Mullen being prime examples)
have moved away from criticizing Pakistan to emphasizing its strategic
importance for the United States, as they realize the harm being done to US
interests in the region. These defence department officials know that without
Pakistan the US would be in deep trouble in South Asia: 40% of US supplies to
its forces in Afghanistan come through Pakistan. The question that is
increasingly emerging is would Pakistanis forgive some of the outlandish and
derogatory comments made against them by
their American counter parts, which were led by CIA Director and potential new Defence Secretary Leon Panetta who accused Pakistan of being either an
accomplice or incompetent.
US anger towards
Pakistan comes from the fact that despite the US providing aid to the tune of
$2.2 billion annually to Pakistan, insecurity in Afghanistan (which lies at the epicentre of US foreign policy thinking in respect to South Asia) or Islamic
terrorism have not ended, or even abated. In addition, American policy-makers are further infuriated by Pakistan’s continuous slide towards state failure, as
it becomes increasingly ungovernable and hostile towards the United States
(according to the Pew Report – before the bin Laden operation – positive views
towards the US and President Obama have declined from 16% in 2009 to 11% in
2011). Washington in other words, wants to see value for money, which is why
much of the rhetoric following Operation Geronimo was about cutting US aid to
Pakistan (US policymakers claimed that Pakistanis were abusing US generosity).
The flaw with this approach is that it has alienated and angered ordinary
Pakistanis who feel that the United States does not appreciate their sacrifices
in fighting Islamic militancy over the last decade. The appearance in 2007, of
the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), the Pakistani Taliban umbrella movement
was arguably a direct consequence of the American presence in Afghanistan. The
TTP claims to promote and protect Islamic Pashtun Pakistani values. It strives
to appear as a resistance movement to the hated pro-American Pakistani military
that over the last few years – arguably in a desire to appease Washington – has
launched military campaigns that have wreaked havoc on those living in the
Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA) and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (previously
known as North-West Frontier Province). The campaigns have created humanitarian
catastrophes that left over 3 million Pakistanis internally displaced.
Pakistanis note that the region as a result has descended into a state of
regular bombings (US drones routinely attack targets in Pakistan – according to
the New America Foundation there were 118 drone attacks in 2010) and acts of
terrorism reign supreme (the South Asia Terrorism Portal noted that in 2010,
over 5,000 people including militants, civilians and security personnel have
died in FATA due to terrorist activity).
As Pakistanis recover
from their shock – the killing of Osama bin Laden and the violation of their
sovereignty – they will increasingly question their relationship with the
United States, which explains why Prime Minister Gilani is emphasizing
Pakistan’s relationship with China and China’s importance to Pakistan. The day
after the bin Laden operation, Beijing issued a statement praising Islamabad
for providing the information that enabled the CIA to organize the Delta 6
operation. On May 4, Ms. Li Hongmei, an editor and columnist with the online
version of the Peoples’ Daily criticized the Obama administration for not only
failing to thank the Pakistanis for their broad intelligence cooperation but
for castigating the Pakistanis as either incompetent or complicit. Two weeks
after the operation Prime Minister Gilani traveled to Beijing to celebrate the
60 years anniversary of Pakistani-Chinese diplomatic ties. Gilani was able to
partake in the inauguration of the China-Pakistan Entrepreneurs Forum, which
follows such agreements as the Pakistan-China Transborder Economic Zone and the
Pakistan-China Investment Company. There have also been discussions between the
Central Banks of Pakistan and China on currency swap arrangements. These
initiative have helped expand economic relations between the two countries (in
2010 Pakistani-Chinese trade was worth about $9 billion, which Gilani and
Premier Wen Jiabao wants to increase to $15 billion in the next few years) as
Pakistan strives to emulate the Chinese economic miracle.
American policymakers
must realize that Pakistan sees China as a more valuable friend than the United
States. This is because since the 1960s Beijing has shown that it would stand
by Pakistan in its time of trouble, relations between the two are conducted in privacy
and Chinese officials never openly castigate or criticize Pakistan, opting to
go out of their way to praise Pakistan for its commitment to fighting Islamic
terrorism. When Beijing wants something done, it requests it in privacy – a
good example was the Red Mosque incident in 2007, which began when Islamic
radicals kidnapped a number of Chinese women working in a Chinese-run health
center (a sex parlour). US policy-makers must take a leaf out of the Chinese way
of conducting foreign policy and realize that when dealing with fragile states,
such as Pakistan, with a highly emotional populace, it is sometimes better to
say nothing in public and a lot more in private. US policy-makers are good at
rhetoric and sound bites, but what they often forget is that sometimes words
spoken to score political points are remembered. Washington must realize that
Pakistanis know that the reason the US provides their country with aid is
because they are needed for US national interest, not because the United States
has a deep commitment to Pakistan. When US policymakers seek to claim the high
moral ground, Pakistanis note US intelligence failure (9/11), Guantanamo Bay
and the US’s role in the Afghan Jihad during which Charlie Wilson and others
supported Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and other famed Islamists. Thus, the more the US
preaches and threatens, the more Pakistan turns away from it, as what Pakistan
wants are friends and not masters.
2 comments:
very good and informative for the students whom are doing thesis or assignments
wow that is great
Post a Comment